Barack Obama, writer?

It would never have occurred to me to ask whether or not Sen. Obama wrote the books attributed to him; but as the Anchoress points out, writers write. It’s what they do, because the need to write drives them. If circumstances are such that they have little time or energy to spare from the other demands of life, they may write very little, but when they can, what they can, they write.Which does raise the reasonable question: do we see that kind of drive in Sen. Obama’s life? Put another way, do the existence and quality of his books (and particularly Dreams from My Father) square with the rest of his writing career? We know Barack Obama wrote virtually nothing for the Harvard Law Review despite serving a term as its president; we know that at Occidental College, he wrote some truly awful poetry; and we know that when it comes to any other evidence of his ability as a writer—”a school paper, an article, a notebook, his Columbia thesis”—that he’s been careful not to let us see it. Jack Cashill argues that on the basis of this evidence, the only reasonable answer to the question is “no”:

Prior to 1990, when Barack Obama contracted to write Dreams From My Father, he had written very close to nothing. Then, five years later, this untested 33 year-old produced what Time Magazine has called—with a straight face—”the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician.”The public is asked to believe Obama wrote Dreams From My Father on his own, almost as though he were some sort of literary idiot savant. I do not buy this canard for a minute, not at all. Writing is as much a craft as, say, golf. To put this in perspective, imagine if a friend played a few rounds in the high 90s and then a few years later, without further practice, made the PGA Tour. It doesn’t happen.

If Cashill’s skepticism is correct, this might seem a curiosity; it’s not exactly a major literary scandal, after all. Indeed, in the realm of political ghostwriting, it would be at most a distant second to JFK accepting the Pulitzer for Profiles in Courage. If Cashill’s analysis, which is close and compelling but not conclusive, is correct that Barack Obama’s ghostwriter was none other than Bill Ayers, that would certainly give the lie to his efforts to deny any kind of close relationship between the two of them, but again, it’s not like there’s any great wrongdoing here. The fact that this question can be not only raised but convincingly argued, however, is a reminder of one very serious issue with the Obama campaign: even after all these months, despite the books, we still don’t really know all that much about Barack Obama, let alone feel like we know him—and he’s done everything he possibly can since bursting on the national scene to keep it that way.

Posted in Barack Obama, Books, Uncategorized.

4 Comments

  1. Here’s a deal – Obama has to show us his poor prose, and McCain has to disclose his 1000+ page medical records for more than a couple of hours to a tiny group of reporters who aren’t allowed to bring in any kind of recording devices.

    Because Obama can hire a ghostwriter, but I don’t share your excitement at the prospect of President Palin, and we should really have some way of knowing how likely that is…

  2. As invasions of privacy go, they aren't coequal. Throw in the complete financial & donor records of the Obama campaign (I don't have any excitement at the possibility of a campaign winning on the basis of tens of millions of dollars raised in violation of FEC guidelines, much less passed on to ACORN for voter-registration drives, and we should really have some way of knowing how likely that is), & we can call it even.

  3. Hey man, let me just say, I’m all for total transparency.

    Billy Graham was once asked how he stayed out of trouble during an era when televangelist was synonymous with corruption scandal, and he said three things (I forget the third one). He never met with anyone in his office without the door being open, and whenever anyone asked about his finances he handed them his checkbook so they could see the balance for themselves. Basically, transparency.

    I say, we get rid of the idea that we’re voting for ascended beings who don’t have mistakes in their past (i.e. stop being Puritains) and lay everything out on the table. You can either have political (coercive) power, *or* you can have secrets, but when you have both, we get in trouble.

Leave a Reply